The aeroelastic behavior of vibrating blade assemblies is usually investigated in the frequency domain where the determination of aeroelastic stability boundaries is separated from the computation of linearized unsteady aerodynamic forces. However, nonlinear fluid-structure interaction caused by oscillating shocks or strong flow separation may significantly influence the aerodynamic damping and hence effect a shift of stability boundaries. In order to investigate such aeroelastic phenomena, the governing equations of structural and fluid motion have to be simultaneously integrated in time. In this paper a technique is presented which analyzes the aeroelastic behavior of an oscillating compressor cascade in the time domain. The structural part of the governing aeroelastic equations is time-integrated according to the algorithm of Newmark, while the unsteady airloads are computed at every time step by an Euler upwind code. The link between the two time integrations is an automatic grid generation in which the used mesh is dynamically deformed as such that it conforms with the deflected blades at every time step. The computed time series of the aeroelastic simulation of an assembly of twenty compressor blades performing torsional vibrations in transonic flow are presented. For subsonic flow, the differences between time domain and frequency domain results are of negligible order. For transonic flow, however, where vibrating shocks and a temporarily choked flow in the blade channel dominate the unsteady flow, the energy transfer between fluid and structure is no longer comparable to that of a linear system. It is demonstrated that the application of the time domain method leads to a significantly different aeroelastic behavior of the blade assembly including a shift of the stability boundary.

1.
Platzer, M. F., and Carta, F. O., 1987/1988, “Aeroelasticity in Axial-Flow Turbomachines, Vol. 1: Unsteady Turbomachinery Aerodynamics. Vol. 2: Structural Dynamics and Aeroelasticity AGARD,” AGARDograph 298.
2.
Kaza
,
K. R. V.
, and
Kielb
,
R. E.
,
1982
, “
Flutter and Response of a Mistuned Cascade in Incompressible Flow
,”
AIAA J.
,
20
, No.
8
, pp.
1120
1127
.
3.
Bendiksen
,
O. O.
,
1984
, “
Flutter of Mistuned Turbomachinery Rotors
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
106
, pp.
25
33
.
4.
Crawley
,
E. F.
, and
Hall
,
K. C.
,
1985
, “
Optimization and Mechanisms of Mistuning in Cascades
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
107
, pp.
418
426
.
5.
Bloemhof
,
H.
, 1988, Flutter of Blade Rows With Mistuning and Structural Coupling, Report No. 14, DGM-LTT, EPF-Lausanne.
6.
Pierre
,
C.
, and
Murthy
,
D. V.
,
1992
, “
Aeroelastic Modal Characteristics of Mistuned Blade Assemblies: Mode Localization and Loss of Eigenstructure
,”
AIAA J.
,
30
, No.
10
, pp.
2483
2496
.
7.
Giles, M., 1995, “Stability and Accuracy of Numerical Boundary Conditions in Aeroelastic Analysis,” COSMASE (Computation of Sciences, Methods and Algorithms an Supercomputing for Engineering), Short Course on Fluid-Structure-Interaction, May 2–5, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden.
8.
Guruswamy
,
G. P.
,
1989
, “
Integrated Approach for Active Coupling of Structures and Fluids
,”
AIAA J.
,
27
, pp.
788
793
.
9.
Piperno, S., Farhat, C., and Larrouturou, B., 1995, “Partitioned Procedures for the Transient Solution of Coupled Aeroelastic Problems, Part I: Model Problem, Theory and Two-Dimensional Applications,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., No. 124, pp. 79–112.
10.
Schulze, S., 1997, “Transonic Aeroelastic Simulation of a Flexible Wing Section,” AGARD-R-822, Numerical Unsteady Aerodynamics and Aeroelastic Simulation, AGARD Structures and Materials Panel, Aalborg, Denmark, pp. 10,1–10,20.
11.
He, L., 1996, Unsteady Flows in Turbomachines, Part 3, VKI Lectures 1996-05, Mar. 11–15.
12.
Ning, W., and He, L., 1997, “Computation of Unsteady Flows Around Oscillating Blades Using Linear and Nonlinear Harmonic Euler Methods,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-229.
13.
Vahdati, M., and Imregun, M., 1994, “Non-linear Aeroelasticity Analyses Using Unstructured Dynamic Meshes,” Symposium on Unsteady Aerodynamics and Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines, Sept. 1994, Fukuoka, Japan.
14.
Marshall, J. G., and Imregun, M., 1996, “An Analysis of the Aeroelastic Behavior of a Typical Fan-Blade With Emphasis on the Flutter Mechanism,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-78.
15.
Bakhle, M., Srivastava, R., Stefko, G. L., and Janus, J. M., 1996, “Development of an Aeroelastic Code Based on an Euler/Navier-Stokes Aerodynamic Solver,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-311.
16.
Blom, F. J., 1998, “Investigations on Computational Fluid-Structure Interaction,” Thesis, DGM-IMHEF, EPF-Lausanne.
17.
Bendiksen, O. O., 1991, A New Approach to Computational Aeroelasticity, AIAA 32nd Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Material Conference, Baltimore, MD, pp. 1712–1727.
18.
Carstens, V., 1991, “Computation of the Unsteady Transonic 2D Cascade Flow by an Euler Algorithm with Interactive Grid Generation,” AGARD CP 507, Transonic Unsteady Aerodynamics and Aeroelasticity, Oct. 7–11, San Diego.
19.
Carstens, V., Bo¨lcs, A., and Ko¨rba¨cher, H., 1993, “Comparison of Experimental and Theoretical Results for Unsteady Transonic Cascade Flow at Design and Off-Design Conditions,” ASME Paper No. 93-GT-100.
20.
van Leer
,
B.
, 1982, Flux Vector Splitting for the Euler Equations, ICASE Report no. 82-30.
21.
Beam
,
A.
, and
Warming
,
R. F.
,
1976
, “
An Implicit Finite-Difference Algorithm for Hyperbolic Systems in Conservation-Law Form
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
,
22
, pp.
87
110
.
22.
Chakravarthy, S. R., 1982, “Euler Equations—Implicit Schemes and Boundary Conditions,” AIAA Paper No. 82-0228.
23.
Carstens, V., 1988, “Two Dimensional Elliptic Grid Generation for Airfoils and Cascades,” DLR-FB pp. 88–52.
24.
Newmark
,
N. M.
,
1959
, “
A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics
,”
A.S.C.M., J. Eng. Mech. Div.
,
85
, pp.
67
94
.
25.
Hennings, H., and Belz, J., 1999, “Experimental Investigation of the Aerodynamic Stability of an Annular Compressor Cascade Performing Tuned Pitching Oscillations in Transonic Flow,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-407.
You do not currently have access to this content.