An experimental and numerical study was performed on an optimized compressor stator cascade designed to operate efficiently at high inlet Mach numbers (M1) ranging from 0.83 to 0.93 (higher supercritical flow conditions). Linear cascade tests confirmed that low losses and high turning were achieved at normal supercritical flow conditions (0.7<M1<0.8), as well as higher supercritical flow conditions (0.83<M1<0.93), both at design and off-design incidences. The performance of this optimized stator cascade is better than those reported in the literature based on Double Circular Arc (DCA) and Controlled Diffusion Airfoil (CDA) blades, where losses increase rapidly for M1>0.83. A two-dimensional (2D) Navier-Stokes solver was applied to the cascade to characterize the performance and flow behavior. Good agreement was obtained between the CFD and the experiment. Experimental loss characteristics, blade surface Mach numbers, shadowgraphs, along with CFD flowfield simulations, were presented to elucidate the flow physics. It is found that low losses are due to the well-controlled boundary layer, which is attributed to an optimum flow structure associated with the blade profile. The multishock pattern and the advantageous pressure gradient distribution on the blade are the key reasons of keeping the boundary layer from separating, which in turn accounts for the low losses at the higher supercritical flow conditions.

1.
Wennerstrom
,
A. J.
, 1990, “
Highly Loaded Axial Flow Compressors: History and Current Developments
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
112
, pp.
567
578
.
2.
Denton
,
J. D.
, 1993, “
Loss Mechanism in Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
115
, pp.
621
656
.
3.
Dunham
,
J.
, 1996, “
Aerodynamic Losses in Turbomachines
,” AGARD-CP-571,
Loss Mechanism and Unsteady Flows in Turbomachines
, K1–K13.
4.
Köller
,
U.
,
Mönig
,
R.
,
Küsters
,
B.
, and
Schreiber
,
H.
, 2000, “
Development of Advanced Compressor Airfoils for Heavy-Duty Gas Turbines-Part I: Design and Optimization
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
122
, pp.
397
405
.
5.
Küsters
,
B.
,
Schreiber
,
H.
,
Köller
,
U.
, and
Mönig
,
R.
, 2000, “
Development of Advanced Compressor Airfoils for Heavy-Duty Gas Turbines-Part II: Experimental and Theoretical Analysis
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
122
, pp.
406
415
.
6.
Sonoda
,
T.
,
Yamaguchi
,
Y.
,
Arima
,
T.
,
Olhofer
,
M.
,
Sendhoff
,
B.
, and
Schreiber
,
H.
, 2004, “
Advanced High Turning Compressor Airfoils for Low Reynolds Number Condition-Part I: Design and Optimization
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
126
(
3
), pp.
350
359
.
7.
Schreiber
,
H.
,
Steinert
,
W.
,
Sonoda
,
T.
, and
Arima
,
T.
, 2004, “
Advanced High Turning Compressor Airfoils for Low Reynolds Number Condition-Part II: Experimental and Numerical Analysis
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
126
(
4
), pp.
482
492
.
8.
Benini
,
E.
, and
Toffolo
,
A.
, 2002, “
Development of High-Performance Airfoils for Axial Flow Compressors Using Evolutionary Computation
,”
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
18
(
3
), pp.
544
554
.
9.
Xu
,
C.
, and
Amano
,
R. S.
, 2002, “
A Turbomachinery Blade Design and Optimization Procedure
,” ASME Paper No. GT-2002-30541.
10.
Rai
,
M.
, and
Madavan
,
N.
, 2001, “
Application of Artificial Neural Networks to Design of Turbomachinery Airfoils
,”
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
17
(
1
), pp.
176
183
.
11.
Yiu
,
K. F. C.
, and
Zangeneh
,
M.
, 2000, “
Three-Dimensional Automatic Optimization Method for Turbomachinery Blade Design
,”
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
16
(
6
), pp.
1174
1181
.
12.
Dunker
,
R. J.
, 1987, “
A Shock Loss Model for Supercritical Subsonic Flows in Transonic Axial Flow Compressors
,” Transonic and Supersonic Phenomena in Turbomachines, pp.
27.1
27.15
, AGARD-CP-401.
13.
Hobbs
,
D. E.
, and
Weingold
,
H. D.
, 1984, “
Development of Controlled Diffusion Airfoils for Multistage Compressor Application
,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
106
, pp.
271
278
.
14.
Steinert
,
W.
,
Eisenberg
,
B.
, and
Starken
,
H.
, 1991, “
Design and Testing of a Controlled Diffusion Airfoil Cascade for Industrial Axial Flow Compressor Application
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
113
, pp.
583
590
.
15.
Steinert
,
W.
, and
Starken
,
H.
, 1994, “
Off-Design Transition and Separation Behavior of a CDA Cascade
,” ASME Paper No. 94-GT-214.
16.
Dunker
,
R.
,
Rechter
,
H.
,
Starken
,
H.
, and
Weyer
,
H.
, 1984, “
Redesign and Performance Analysis of a Transonic Axial Compressor Stator and Equivalent Plane Cascades With Subsonic Controlled Diffusion Blades
,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
106
, pp.
279
287
.
17.
Niederdrenk
,
P.
,
Sobieczky
,
H.
, and
Dulikravich
,
G. S.
, 1987, “
Supercritical Cascade Flow Analysis With Shock-Boundary Layer Interaction and Shock-Free Redesign
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
109
, pp.
413
419
.
18.
Hoheisel
,
H.
, and
Seyb
,
N. J.
, 1987, “
The Boundary Layer Behavior of Highly Loaded Compressor Cascade at Transonic Flow Conditions
,” Transonic and Supersonic Phenomena in Turbomachines, pp.
4.1
4.17
, AGARD-CP-401.
19.
Yamaguchi
,
Y.
, and
Arima
,
T.
, 2000, “
Multi-Objective Optimization for the Transonic Compressor Stator Blade
,”
8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMOSymposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization
, Long Beach, CA, Paper No. AIAA-2000-4909.
20.
Song
,
B.
,
Gui
,
X.
,
Li
,
S.-M.
,
Douglas
,
J.
, and
Ng
,
W.
, 2002, “
Flow periodicity improvement in a High Speed Compressor Cascade with a Large Turning-Angle
,”
38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit
, Indianapolis, Indiana, Paper No. AIAA 2002-3539.
21.
Song
,
B.
, and
Ng
,
W.
, 2004, “
Influence of Axial Velocity Density Ratio in Cascade Testing of Supercritical Compressor Blades
,”
40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit
, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Paper No. AIAA-2004-3414.
22.
Johnsen
,
I. A.
, and
Bullock
,
R. O.
, 1965, “
Aerodynamic Design of Axial-Flow Compressors
,” revised version, NASA SP-36.
23.
Song
,
B.
, 2003, “
Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Optimized High-Turning Supercritical Compressor Blades
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg VA.
You do not currently have access to this content.