The aerodynamics of a fully cooled, axial, single stage high-pressure turbine operating at design corrected conditions of corrected speed, flow function, and stage pressure ratio has been investigated experimentally and computationally and presented in Part I of this paper. In that portion of the paper, flow-field predictions obtained using the computational fluid dynamics codes Numeca’s FINE/TURBO and the code TURBO were obtained using different design methodologies that approximated the fully-cooled turbine stage in different ways. These predictions were compared to measurements obtained using the Ohio State University Gas Turbine Laboratory Turbine Test Facility, in a process that was essentially a design methodology validation study, instead of a computational methodology optimization study. The difference between the two is that the designers were given one chance to use their codes (as a designer would normally do) instead of using the existing data to fine-tune their grids/methodologies by doing grid studies and changes in the turbulence models employed. Part I of this paper showed differing results from the two solvers, which appeared to be mainly dependent on the differences in grid resolution and/or modeling features selected by the code users. Examining these occurrences points to places where the design methodology could be improved, but it became clear that metrics were needed to compare overall performance of each approach. In this part of the paper, three criteria are proposed for measuring overall prediction quality of the unsteady predictions, which include the unsteady envelope size, envelope shape, and power spectrum. These measures capture the main characteristics of the unsteady data and allow designers to use the criteria of most interest to them. In addition, these can be used to track how well predictions improve over time as grid resolutions and modeling techniques change.

1.
Dunn
,
M. G.
, 2001, “
Convective Heat Transfer and Aerodynamics in Axial Flow Turbines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
113
, pp.
637
686
.
2.
Rao
,
K. V.
,
Delaney
,
R. A.
, and
Dunn
,
M. G.
, 1994, “
Vane-Blade Interaction in a Transonic Turbine: Part II—Heat Transfer
,”
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
10
(
3
), pp.
312
317
.
3.
Rao
,
K. V.
,
Delaney
,
R. A.
, and
Dunn
,
M. G.
, 1994, “
Vane-Blade Interaction in a Transonic Turbine: Part I—Aerodynamics
,”
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
10
(
3
), pp.
305
311
.
4.
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Bennett
,
W. A.
,
Delaney
,
R. A.
, and
Rao
,
K. V.
, 1992, “
Investigation of Unsteady Flow Through a Transonic Turbine Stage: Data/Prediction Comparison for Time-averaged and Phase-Resolved Pressure Data
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
114
, pp.
91
99
.
5.
Giles
,
M. B.
, 1988, “
UNSFLO: A Numerical Method for Unsteady Inviscid Flow in Turbomachinery
,” MIT Gas Turbine Laboratory Report No. 195.
6.
Guenette
,
G. R.
,
Epstein
,
A. H.
,
Giles
,
M. B.
,
Haimes
,
R.
, and
Norton
,
R. J. G.
, 1988, “
Fully Scaled Transonic Turbine Rotor Heat Transfer Measurements
,” ASME Paper No. 88-GT-171.
7.
Davis
,
R. L.
,
Yao
,
J.
,
Clark
,
J. P.
,
Stetson
,
G.
,
Alonso
,
J. J.
,
Jameson
,
A.
,
Haldeman
,
C. W.
, and
Dunn
,
M. G.
, 2004, “
Unsteady Interaction Between a Transonic Turbine Stage and Downstream Components
,”
Int. J. Rotating Mach.
1023-621X,
10
(
6
), pp.
495
506
.
8.
Haldeman
,
C. W.
,
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Abhari
,
R. S.
,
Johnson
,
P. D.
, and
Montesdeoca
,
X. A.
, 2000, “
Experimental and Computational Investigation of the Time-Averaged and Time-Resolved Pressure Loading on a Vaneless Counter-Rotating Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-0445.
9.
Weaver
,
M. W.
,
Manwaring
,
S.
,
Abhari
,
R. S.
,
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Salay
,
M. J.
,
Frey
,
K. K.
, and
Heidegger
,
N.
, 2000, “
Forcing Function Measurements and Predictions of a Transonic Vaneless Counter-Rotating Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-0375.
10.
Haldeman
,
C. W.
,
Mathison
,
R. M.
,
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Southworth
,
S.
,
Harral
,
J. W.
, and
Heitland
,
G.
, 2008, “
Aerodynamic and Heat Flux Measurements in a Single Stage Fully Cooled Turbine—Part I: Experimental Approach
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
130
(
2
), p.
021015
.
11.
Haldeman
,
C. W.
,
Mathison
,
R. M.
,
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Southworth
,
S.
,
Harral
,
J. W.
, and
Heitland
,
G.
, 2008, “
Aerodynamic and Heat Flux Measurements in a Single Stage Fully Cooled Turbine—Part II: Experimental Results
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
130
(
2
), p.
021016
.
12.
Praisner
,
T. J.
, and
Clark
,
J. P.
, 2007, “
Predicting Transition in Turbomachinery, Part I—A Review and New Model Development
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
129
(
1
), pp.
1
13
.
13.
Oberkampf
,
W. L.
, and
Barone
,
M. F.
, 2006, “
Measures of Aggreement Between Computation and Experiment: Validation Metrics
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
0021-9991,
217
(
1
), pp.
5
36
.
14.
Oberkampf
,
W. L.
, and
Blottner
,
F. G.
, 1998, “
Issues In Computational Fluid Dynamics Code Verification and Validation
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
36
(
5
), pp.
687
695
.
15.
Oberkampf
,
W. L.
, and
Trucano
,
T. G.
, 2002, “
Verification and Validation in Computational Fluid Dynamics
,”
Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
0376-0421,
38
(
3
), pp.
209
272
.
16.
Roy
,
C. J.
, 2005, “
Review of Code Solution and Verification Procedures for Computational Simulation
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
0021-9991,
205
(
1
), pp.
131
156
.
17.
Stern
,
F.
,
Wilson
,
R.
,
Coleman
,
H.
, and
Paterson
,
E.
, 2001, “
Comprehensive Approach to Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations—Part 1: Methodologies and Procedures
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
123
(
4
), pp.
793
802
.
18.
Stern
,
F.
,
Wilson
,
R.
,
Coleman
,
H.
, and
Paterson
,
E.
, 2001, “
Comprehensive Approach to Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations—Part 2: Application for RANS Simulation of a Cargo/Container Ship
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
123
(
4
), pp.
803
810
.
19.
Stern
,
F.
,
Wilson
,
R.
, and
Shao
,
J.
, 2005, “
Quantitative V&V of CFD Simulations and Certification of CFD Codes
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
0271-2091,
50
(
11
), pp.
1335
1355
.
20.
Haldeman
,
C. W.
, 2003, “
An Experimental Investigation of Clocking Effects on Turbine Aerodynamics Using a Modern 3-D One and One-Half Stage High Pressure Turbine for Code Verification and Flow Model Development
,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, p.
345
.
You do not currently have access to this content.