This paper reports on the improvements of flux enforcement and auxiliary state farfield boundary conditions for Euler and Navier–Stokes computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes. The new conditions are based on 1D characteristic data and also on the introduction in the boundary conditions of certain numerical features of the numerical scheme used for the interior of the domain. In the presence of strong streamwise gradients of the flow field at the farfield boundaries, the new conditions perform significantly better than their conventional counterparts in that they (a) preserve the order of the space-discretization and (b) greatly reduce the error in estimating integral output. A coarse-grid CFD analysis of the compressible flow field in an annular duct for which an analytical solution is available yields a mass flow error of 62% or 2%, depending on whether the best or the worst farfield boundary condition (BC) implementation is used. The presented BC enhancements can be applied to structured, unstructured, cell-centered, and cell-vertex solvers.

1.
Hirsch
,
C.
, 1994,
Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows
, Vol.
2
,
Wiley
,
Chichester, UK
.
2.
Campobasso
,
M.
,
Bonfiglioli
,
A.
, and
Baba-Ahmadi
,
M.
, 2009, “
Development of Efficient and Accurate CFD Technologies for Wind Turbine Unsteady Aerodynamics
,”
14th Event of International Conference Series on Fluid Flow Technologies
, Vol.
2
,
J.
Vad
, ed.,
Budapest University of Technology and Economics
,
Budapest
, pp.
879
886
.
3.
Venkateswaran
,
S.
, and
Merkle
,
C.
, 1999,
Analysis of Preconditioning Methods for the Euler and Navier-Stokes Equations
(
30th VKI Lecture Series on Computational Fluid Dynamics
).
4.
Jameson
,
A.
, 1991, “
Time Dependent Calculations Using Multigrid, With Applications to Unsteady Flows Past Airfoils and Wings
,” AIAA Paper No. 91-1596.
5.
Bonfiglioli
,
A.
,
Campobasso
,
M.
, and
Carpentieri
,
B.
, 2009, “
Parallel Unstructured Three-Dimensional Turbulent Flow Analyses Using Efficiently Preconditioned Newton-Krylov Solver
,”
19th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference
, San Antonio, TX, AIAA Paper No. 2009-4137.
6.
Campobasso
,
M. S.
,
Duta
,
M.
, and
Giles
,
M.
, 2003, “
Adjoint Calculation of Sensitivities of Turbomachinery Objective Functions
,”
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
19
(
4
), pp.
693
703
.
7.
Morrison
,
J.
, 2003, “
ISAAC, An Integrated Solution Algorithm for Arbitrary Configurations
,” NASA, http://isaac-cfd.sourceforge.nethttp://isaac-cfd.sourceforge.net
8.
Arnone
,
A.
,
Liou
,
M. -S.
, and
Povinelli
,
L.
, 1993, “
Multigrid Time-Accurate Integration of Navier-Stokes Equations
,” Technical Memorandum NASA TM 106373, ICOMP-93-37, Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH.
9.
Wang
,
Z.
, and
Sun
,
Y.
, 2002, “
A Curvature-Based Wall Boundary Condition for the Euler Equations on Unstructured Grids
,”
40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
, Reno, NV, AIAA Paper No. 2002-0966.
10.
Dadone
,
A.
, and
Grossman
,
B.
, 1994, “
Surface Boundary Conditions for the Numerical Solution of the Euler Equations
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
32
(
2
), pp.
285
293
.
You do not currently have access to this content.