A new method for fluid‐structure interaction (FSI) predictions is here introduced, based on a reduced-order model (ROM) for the structure, described by its mode shapes and natural frequencies. A linear structure is assumed as well as Rayleigh damping. A two-way coupling between the fluid and the structure is ensured by a loosely coupling staggered approach: the aerodynamic loads computed by the flow solver are used to determine the deformations from the modal equations, which are sent back to the flow solver. The method is first applied to a clamped beam oscillating under the effect of von Karman vortices. The results are compared to a full-order model. Then a flutter application is considered on the AGARD wing 445.6. Finally, the modal approach is applied to the aeroelastic behavior of an axial compressor stage. The influence of passing rotor blade wakes on the downstream stator blades is investigated.

References

1.
Marshall
,
J. G.
, and
Imregun
,
M.
, 1996, “
A Review of Aeroelasticity Methods with Emphasis on Turbomachinery Applications
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
,
10
, pp.
237
267
.
2.
SCAI, 2007, MpCCI User Manual version 3.0.6.
3.
NUMECA International 2007, User Manual FineTM/Turbo version 8.
4.
de Boer
,
A.
,
van der Schoot
,
M. S.
, and
Bijl
,
H.
, 2007, “
Mesh Deformation Based on Radial Basis Function Interpolation
,”
Comput. Struct.
85
, pp.
784
795
.
5.
Fenwick
,
C. L.
, and
Allen
,
C. B.
, 2007, “
Flutter Analysis of the BACT Wing with Consideration of Control Surface Representation
,” 25th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA 2007-3805.
6.
Sayma
,
A. I.
,
Vahdati
,
M.
, and
Imregun
,
M.
, 2000, “
An Integrated Nonlinear Approach for Turbomachinery Forced Response—Part I: Formulation
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
14
, pp.
87
101
.
7.
Humar
,
J. L.
, 2001,
Dynamics of Structures
, 2nd ed.,
Swets & Zeitlinger
,
Amsterdam
.
8.
Boyce
,
W. E.
, and
DiPrima
,
R. C.
, 2000,
Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems
, 7th ed.,
John Wiley & Sons
,
New York
.
9.
Simulia
,
D. S.
, 2008, Abaqus Analysis User’s Manual version 6.8.
10.
Hübner
,
B.
,
Walhorn
,
E.
, and
Dinkier
,
D.
, 2004, “
A Monolithic Approach to Fluid-Structure Interaction Using Space-Time Finite Elements
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
,
193
, pp.
2087
2104
.
11.
Yates
,
E. C.
, 1987, “
AGARD Standard Aeroelastic Configurations for Dynamic Response. Candidate Configuration I.-wing 445.6
,” Paper No. NASA-TM-100492.
12.
Spalart
,
P. R.
, and
Allmaras
,
R.
, 1994, “
A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows
,”
Rech. Aerosp.
,
1
, pp.
5
21
.
13.
Kalitzin
,
G.
,
Medic
,
G.
,
Iacaarion
,
G.
, and
Durbin
,
P.
, 2005, “
Near-Wall Behavior of RANS Turbulence Models and Implications for Wall Functions
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
,
204
, pp.
265
291
.
14.
Pahlavanloo
,
P.
, 2007, “
Dynamic Aeroelastic Simulation of the AGARD 445.6 Wing Using Edge
,” Paper No. FOI-R—2259-SE.
15.
Haase
,
W.
,
Selmin
,
V.
, and
Winzell
,
B.
, 2003,
Progress in Computational Flow-Structure Interaction: Results of the Project UNSI Supported by the European Union 1998-2000
,
Springer
,
New York
.
16.
Beaubien
,
R. J.
, and
Nitzsche
,
F.
, 2005, “
Time and Frequency Domain Flutter Solutions for the AGARD 445.6 Wing
,” Paper No. IF-102, IFASD.
17.
Vilmin
,
S.
,
Lorrain
,
E.
,
Hirsch
,
Ch.
, and
Swoboda
,
M.
, 2006, “
Unsteady Flow Modeling Across the Rotor/Stator Interface Using the Nonlinear Harmonic Method
,” ASME Turbo Expo 2006, GT2006-90210.
You do not currently have access to this content.