Abstract

Current trends in the automotive industry have placed an increased emphasis on downsized turbocharged engines for passenger vehicles. The turbocharger is increasingly relied upon to improve power output across a wide range of engine operating conditions, placing a greater emphasis on turbocharger off-design performance. An off-design condition of significant importance is performance at low turbine velocity ratios, since it is relevant to engine transient response and also to efficient energy extraction from pressure pulses in the unsteady exhaust flow. An increased focus has been placed on equipping turbochargers with mixed flow turbine rotors instead of conventional radial flow turbine rotors to improve off-design performance and to reduce rotor inertia.

A recognized feature of a mixed flow turbine is the spanwise variation of flow conditions across the blade leading edge. This is a consequence of the reduction in leading edge radius from shroud to hub, coupled with the increasing tangential velocity of the flow due to conserved angular momentum as the radius decreases. The result is increasingly positive incidence toward the hub side of the leading edge. The resulting region of highly positive incidence at the hub produces separation from the suction surface and generates significant loss within the rotor passage.

The aim of this study was to determine if the losses in a mixed flow turbine (MFT) could be reduced by the use of leaned stator vanes, which deliberately created a significant spanwise variation of flow angle between hub and shroud at rotor inlet, to reduce the positive incidence at the hub. The turbine performance with a series of leaned vanes was compared against that of a straight vane using a validated computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model. It was found that increasing vane lean improved turbine performance at all operating points considered. An increase of 3.2 percentage points in stage total-to-static efficiency was achieved at a key off-design operating point.

Experimental testing of a set of leaned vanes and the baseline vanes confirmed the advantage of the leaned vanes at all operating points, with an increase in measured efficiency of 2.6 percentage points at the key off-design condition. Unsteady CFD models confirmed the same level of improvement at this operating point.

The CFD and experimental results confirmed that the losses in an MFT can be reduced by the use of leaned stator vanes to shape the flow at rotor inlet.

References

1.
Japikse
,
D.
, and
Baines
,
N. C.
,
1994
,
Introduction to Turbomachinery
,
Concepts/NREC
,
White River Junction, VT
.
2.
Spence
,
S. W. T.
, and
Artt
,
D. W.
,
1998
, “
An Experimental Assessment of Incidence Losses in a Radial Inflow Turbine Rotor
,”
IMechE J. Power Energy
,
212
(
1
), pp.
43
53
. 10.1243/0957650981536727
3.
Walkingshaw
,
J.
,
Spence
,
S.
, and
Ehrhard
,
J.
,
2011
, “
An Investigation Into Improving Off-Design Performance in a Turbocharger Turbine Utilizing Non-radial Blading
,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-45717.
4.
Watson
,
N.
, and
Janota
,
M. S.
,
1982
,
Turbocharging the Internal Combustion Engine
,
The MacMillan Press Ltd.
,
London
.
5.
Minegishi
,
H.
,
Matsushita
,
H.
, and
Sakakida
,
M.
,
1995
, “
Development of a Small Mixed-Flow Turbine for Automotive Turbochargers
,” ASME Paper No. 95-GT-053.
6.
Leonard
,
T.
,
Spence
,
S.
,
Early
,
J.
, and
Filsinger
,
D.
,
2013
, “
A Numerical Study of Automotive Turbocharger Mixed Flow Turbine Inlet Geometry for off Design Performance
,”
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pumps and Fans (ICPF) with Compressors and Wind Turbines
,
Beijing, China
,
Sept. 9–22
, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Volume
52
, pp.
649
657
.
7.
Leonard
,
T.
,
Spence
,
S.
,
Early
,
J.
, and
Filsinger
,
D.
,
2014
, “
A Numerical Study of Inlet Geometry for a Low Inertia Mixed Flow Turbocharger Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. GT2014-25850.
8.
Whitfield
,
A.
, and
Baines
,
N. C.
,
1990
,
Design of Radial Turbomachines
,
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
,
New York, NY
.
9.
Karamanis
,
N.
,
Martinez-Botas
,
R. F.
, and
Su
,
C. C.
,
2001
, “
Mixed Flow Turbines: Inlet and Exit Flow Under Steady and Pulsating Conditions
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
123
(
2
), pp.
359
371
. 10.1115/1.1354141
10.
Palfreyman
,
D.
, and
Martinez-Botas
,
R. F.
,
2002
, “
Numerical Study of the Internal Flow Field Characteristics in Mixed Flow Turbines
,” ASME Paper No. GT2002-30372.
11.
Rajoo
,
S.
, and
Martinez-Botas
,
R.
,
2008
, “
Variable Geometry Mixed Flow Turbine for Turbochargers: An Experimental Study
,”
Int. J. Fluid Mach. Syst.
,
1
(
1
), pp.
155
168
. 10.5293/IJFMS.2008.1.1.155
12.
Morrison
,
R.
,
Spence
,
S.
,
Kim
,
S.
,
Filsinger
,
D.
, and
Leonard
,
T.
,
2016
, “
Investigation of the Effects of Flow Conditions at Rotor Inlet on Mixed Flow Turbine Performance for Automotive Applications
,”
NLETT Turbocharging Seminar
,
Tianjin, China
,
Sept. 21–22
, pp.
1
12
.
13.
Lee
,
S. P.
,
Barrans
,
S. M.
, and
Jupp
,
M. L.
,
2018
, “
Investigation Into the Impact of Span-Wise Flow Distribution on the Performance of a Mixed Flow Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. GT2018-76992.
14.
Roclawski
,
H.
,
Böhle
,
M.
, and
Gugau
,
M.
,
2012
, “
Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Mixed Flow Turbine Wheel
,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-68233.
15.
Leonard
,
T.
,
Spence
,
S.
, and
Filsinger
,
D.
,
2018
, “
A Numerical and Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Mixed Flow Turbine Inlet Cone Angle and Inlet Blade Angle
,” ASME Paper No. GT2018-75096.
16.
Walkingshaw
,
J.
,
Spence
,
S.
, and
Ehrhard
,
J.
,
2010
, “
A Numerical Study of the Flow Fields in a Highly Off-Design Variable Geometry Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. GT2010-22669.
17.
Simpson
,
A.
,
Spence
,
S.
, and
Watterson
,
J.
,
2013
, “
Numerical and Experimental Study of the Performance Effects of Varying Vaneless Space and Vane Solidity in Radial Turbine Stators
,”
ASME J Turbomach.
,
135
(
3
), p.
031001
. 10.1115/1.4007525
18.
Simpson
,
A.
,
Spence
,
S. W.
, and
Artt
,
D. W.
,
2006
, “
Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Varying Stator Design Parameters for a Radial Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90152.
You do not currently have access to this content.