The active magnetic bearing (AMB) is a relatively new technology which has many advantages compared with conventional bearing design. In an AMB system, the rolling-element back-up bearings are indispensable to protect the magnetic bearing rotor and stator, and other stationary seals along the rotor shaft. In this paper, a theoretical formulation is proposed and solved numerically to examine the transient response of the flexible rotor, from the time just previous to when the AMB shuts down and including the rotor drop onto the back-up bearing. The backward whirl of the rotor, which may lead to the destructive damage of the machinery, has been analytically predicted at very light support damping and very high support damping. Also, the vibration due to the nonlinearity of the contact point geometry has been included in the analysis. The influence of the support damping on the displacement of the disk and also the contact force between the journal and the inner-race of the back-up bearing have been computed for various rotor system parameters. By comparing these results with the optimum support damping for the simple flexible rotor model, it is shown that this support damping optimization can be applicable for specifying the required optimum range of support damping for the back-up bearings of AMB systems.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Machinery, Magnetic bearings, Rotors, Transients (Dynamics), Damping, Bearings, Bearing design, Damage, Disks, Displacement, Geometry, Optimization, Stators, Vibration, Whirls
1.
Pugnet, J. M., Bolusset, D., and Jehl, J., 1987, “The Application of Dry Seals and Active Magnetic Bearings to an Oil-free Centrifugal Compressor,” I. Mech. E., ClOl/87, pp. 35–42.
2.
Schoeneck, K. A., and Hustak, J. F., 1987, “Comparison of Analytical and Field Experience for a Centrifugal Compressor using Active Magnetic Bearings,” I. Mech. E., C104/87, pp. 43–51.
3.
Fort, J. P., 1989, “From Present to Future Applications of Magnetic Bearings,” Revolve ’89, Proceedings, A Symposium on Dry Gas Seals and Magnetic Bearings, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, Sep., pp. 1–14.
4.
Ehrich, F. F., and O’Connor, J. J., 1967, “Stator Whirl With Rotors in Bearing Clearance,” ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY, Aug., pp. 381–390.
5.
Muszynska, A., 1984, “Partial Lateral Rotor to Stator Rubs,” I. Mech. E., C281/84, pp. 327–335.
6.
Day
W. B.
,
1987
, “
Asymptotic Expansions in Nonlinear Rotordynamics
,”
Quartery of Applied Mathematics
, Jan., Vol.
44
, No.
4
, pp.
779
–
792
.
7.
Zalik
R. A.
,
1989
, “
The Jeffcott Equations in Nonlinear Rotordynamics
,”
Quartery of Applied Mathematics
, Dec., Vol.
47
, No.
4
, pp.
585
–
599
.
8.
Gelin, A., Pugnet, J. M., and Hagopian, J. D., 1990, “Dynamic Behavior of Flexible Rotors with Active Magnet Bearings on Safety Auxiliary Bearings,” Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Rotordynamics, Lyon, France, Sep., pp. 503–508.
9.
Kirk, R. G., and Gunter, E. J., 1972, “Effect of Support Flexibility and Damping on the Dynamic Response of a Single mass Flexible Rotor in Elastic Bearings,” NASA CR-2083, July.
10.
Barrett
L. E.
,
Gunter
E. J.
, and
Allaire
P. E.
,
1978
, “
Optimum Bearing and Support Damping for Unbalance Response and Stability of Rotating Machinery
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING
, Jan., Vol.
100
, pp.
89
–
94
.
11.
Chattopadhyay, S., and Saxena, R., 1989, “Nonlinear Dynamics of High Performance Machine Systems,” Diagnostics, Vehicle Dynamics and Special Topics, The 1989 ASME Design Technical Conferences—12th Biennial Conference on Mechanical Vibration and Noise, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Sep., DE-Vol. 18-5, pp. 283–287.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1996
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.