This study is intended to complement many existing analytical studies in the area of semiactive suspensions by providing a field evaluation of semiactive magneto rheological (MR) primary suspensions for heavy trucks. A set of four controllable MR dampers are fabricated and used experimentally to test the effectiveness of a semiactive skyhook suspension on a heavy truck. In order to evaluate the performance of the semiactive suspensions, the performance of the truck equipped with the MR dampers is primarily compared with the performance of the truck equipped with the stock passive dampers. The performance of the semiactive system and the original passive system are compared for two different driving conditions. First, the truck is driven over a speed bump at approximately 8–11 kmh (5–7 mph) in order to establish a comparison between the performance of the MR and stock dampers to transient inputs at the wheels. Second, the truck is driven along a stretch of relatively straight and level highway at a constant speed of 100 kmh (62 mph) in order to compare the performance of the two types of dampers in steady state driving conditions. Acceleration data for both driving conditions are analyzed in both time and frequency domains. The data for the speed bumps indicate that the magneto rheological dampers used (with the skyhook control policy) in this study have a small effect on the vehicle body and wheel dynamics, as compared to the passive stock dampers. The highway driving data shows that magneto rheological dampers and the skyhook control policy are effective in reducing the root mean square (RMS) of the measured acceleration at most measurement points, as compared to the stock dampers.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
road vehicles, vibration control, magnetorheology
Topics:
Dampers, Trucks, Vehicles, Steady state, Transients (Dynamics), Rheology
1.
Gillespie, T. D., 1985, “Heavy Truck Ride,” Society of Automotive Engineers, Special Publications No. SP-607, February.
2.
Elmadany, M. M., 1980, “An Assessment of Ride Quality of Heavy-Duty Trucks,” Society of Automotive Engineers, Publication No. 801418, November.
3.
Elmadany, M. M., and Dokainish, M. A., 1980, “Optimum Design of Tractor-Semitrailer Suspension Systems,” Society of Automotive Engineers, Publication No. 801419, November.
4.
Laird, L. A., 1987, “Measurement and Presentation of Truck Ride Vibrations,” Society of Automotive Engineers, Publication No. J1490, January.
5.
Stribersky, A., and Francher, P. S., 1988, “The Non-linear Behavior of Heavy-Duty Truck Combinations With Respect to Straight Line Stability,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Publication No. 88-WA/DSC-37, November.
6.
Elmadany
,
M. M.
,
1987
, “
Nonlinear Ride Analysis of Heavy Trucks
,”
Comput. Struct.
,
25
, No.
1
, pp.
69
–
82
.
7.
Hedrick, J. K., 1973, “Some Optimal Control Techniques Applicable to Suspension System Design,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Publication No. 73-ICT-55.
8.
Hac
,
A.
,
1985
, “
Suspension Optimization of a 2-DOF Vehicle Model Using Stochastic Optimal Control Technique
”
J. Sound Vib.
,
100
, No.
3
, pp.
343
–
357
.
9.
Crosby, M. J., and Karnopp, D. C., 1973, “The Active Damper,” Shock Vib. Bulletin, 43, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C.
10.
Thompson
,
A. G.
,
1984
, “
Optimal and Suboptimal Linear Active Suspensions for Road Vehicles
,”
Vehicle System Dynamics
,
13
, pp.
61
–
72
.
11.
Chalasani, R. M., 1986 (a), “Ride Performance Potential of Active Suspension Systems-Part I: Simplified Analysis Based on a Quarter-Car Model,” Proceedings of 1986 ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, CA.
12.
Chalasani, R. M., 1986 (b), “Ride Performance Potential of Active Suspension Systems-Part II: Comprehensive Analysis Based on a Full-Car Model,” ASME Symposium on Simulation and Control of Ground Vehicles and Transportation Systems, AMD-Vol. 80, DSC-Vol. 2, pp. 187–204.
13.
Karnopp, D. C., and Crosby, M. J., 1974 (a), “System for Controlling the Transmission of Energy Between Spaced Members,” U.S. Patent 3,807,678, April.
14.
Krasnicki, E. J., 1980, “Comparison of Analytical and Experimental Results for a Semiactive Vibration Isolator,” Shock Vib. Bulletin, 50, September.
15.
Margolis, D. L., 1983, “The Approximate Frequency Response of Semiactive Systems Requiring No Computer,” J. Franklin Inst., 316, No. 3, September.
16.
Malsbury, T. N., 1985, “Semiactive Control of a Parallel Flow Path Vibration Isolator,” Master of Science Thesis, University of California at Davis, California.
17.
Karnopp, D., Crosby, M. M., and Harwood, R. A., 1974 (b), “Vibration Control Using Semiactive Force Generators,” ASME J. Eng. Ind., pp. 619–626.
18.
Carlson, J. D., 1994, “The Promise of Controllable Fluids,” 4th International Conference on New Actuators, Actuator 94, pp. 266–270.
19.
Rabinow
,
J.
,
1948
, “
The Magnetic Fluid Clutch
,”
AIEE Trans.
,
67
, pp.
1308
–
1315
.
20.
Simns
,
N. D.
,
Stanway
,
R.
, and
Johnson
,
A. R.
,
1999
, “
Vibration Control Using Smart Fluids: A State-of-the-Art Review
,”
Shock Vib. Dig.
,
31
, pp.
195
–
203
.
21.
Ahmadian, M., 1993, “Ride Evaluation of a Class 8 Truck with Semiactive Suspensions,” Advanced Automotive Technologies, ASME, DSC-Vol 52k.
22.
Barak, P., 1991, “Magic Numbers in Design of Suspensions for Passenger Cars,” SAE Passenger Car Meeting and Exposition, SAE paper #911921, Vol. 100, Section 6, September.
Copyright © 2001
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.