This work outlines a cohesive approach for the design and implementation of a genetically optimized, active aeroelastic delta wing. Emphasis was placed on computational efficiency of model development and efficient means for optimizing sensor and actuator geometries. Reduced-order models of potential-flow aerodynamics were developed for facilitation of analysis and design of the aeroelastic system in the early design phase. Using these methods, models capturing “95% of the physics with 8% of the modeling effort” can be realized to evaluate various active and passive design considerations. The aeroelastic delta wing model was employed in determining the most effective locations and sizes for transducers required to provide flutter control. The basic design presented is based upon an analytical model of the structure. A comparison of optimization strategies led to the use of a genetic algorithm to determine the optimal transducer locations, sizes, and orientations required to provide effective flutter control based upon an open-loop performance metric. The genetic algorithm and performance metric essentially provided loop shaping through the adaptive structure design. An experimental model was then developed based upon the optimal transducer designs. Wind tunnel tests were performed to demonstrate closed-loop performance for flutter control. Results from this study indicate that a single sensor/actuator pair can be designed to extend the flutter boundary and selectively couple to only those modes required to control the response.

1.
Rule, J. A., Richard, R. E., and Clark, R. L., 2000, “Experimental Investigation of Delta Wing Flutter Control,” AIAA J.,
2.
Smith, G. C., 2000, “Design Methodologies for Optimum Spatial Compensation of Adaptive Structures,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Duke University, Durham, NC.
3.
Lim
,
K. B.
, and
Gawronski
,
W.
,
1996
, “
Hankel Singular Values of Flexible Structures in Discreet time
,”
J. Guid. Control Dyn.
,
19
(
6
), pp.
131
145
.
4.
Lim
,
K. B.
,
1997
, “
Disturbance Rejection Approach to Actuator and Sensor Placement
,”
J. Guid. Control Dyn.
,
20
(
1
), pp.
202
204
.
5.
Clark
,
R. L.
, and
Cox
,
D. E.
,
1999
, “
Band-Limited Actuator and Sensor Selection for Disturbance Rejection: Application to Structural Acoustic Control
,”
J. Guid. Control Dyn.
,
22
(
5
), pp.
740
743
.
6.
Rule, J. A., Richard, R. E., and Clark, R. L., 2000, “Design of an Aeroelastic Wing Model for Active Flutter Control,” J. Guid. Control Dyn.
7.
Andersen, B. W., 1954, “Vibration of Triangular Cantilever Plates by Ritz Method,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., pp. 356–370.
8.
Clark, R. L., Saunders, W. R., and Gibbs, G. P., 1998, Adaptive Structures, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
9.
Rule, J. A., Cox, D. E., and Clark, R. L., 2000, “Aerodynamic Model Reduction Through Balanced Realization,” AIAA Journal.
10.
Hagood, N. W., Chung, W. H., and Von Flotow, A., 1990, “Modeling of Piezoelectric Actuator Dynamics for Active Structural Control,” Proceedings of the 31st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, April 2–4, pp. 2242–2256, AIAA-90-1087-CP.
11.
Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolski, S. A., and Vetterling, W, T., 1988, Numerical Recipes in C; The Art of Scientific Computing, pp. 111–141, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
12.
Goldberg D. E., 1989, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
13.
Baek
,
K. H.
, and
Elliot
,
S. J.
,
1995
, “
Natural Algorithms for Choosing Source Locations in Active Control Systems
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
186
, pp.
245
267
.
14.
Rao
,
S. S.
,
Pan
,
T. S.
, and
Venkavya
,
V. B.
,
1999
, “
Optimal Placement of Actuators in Actively Controlled Structures Using Genetic Algorithms
,”
AIAA J.
,
37
(
10
), pp.
1180
1186
.
15.
Skogestad, S., and Postlethwaite, I., 1996, Multivariable Feedback Control; Analysis and Design, pp. 349-396, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, England.
16.
Tang, D., Henry, J. K., and Dowell, E. H., 1999, “Limit Cycle Oscillations of Delta Wing Models in Low Subsonic Flow,” AIAA J., 37(11).
You do not currently have access to this content.