The selection of parameters is most important to successful updating of finite element models. When the parameters are chosen on the basis of engineering understanding the model predictions are brought into agreement with experimental observations, and the behavior of the structure, even when differently configured, can be determined with confidence. Physical phenomena may be misrepresented in the original model, or may be absent altogether. In any case the updated model should represent an improved physical understanding of the structure and not simply consist of unrepresentative numbers which happen to cause the results of the model to agree with particular test data. The present paper introduces a systematic approach for the selection and physical realization of updated terms. In the realization process, the discrete equilibrium equation formed by mass, and stiffness matrices is converted to a continuous form at each node. By comparing the resulting differential equation with governing equations known to represent physical phenomena, the updated terms and their physical effects can be recognized. The approach is demonstrated by an experimental example.

1.
Mottershead
,
J. E.
, and
Friswell
,
M. I.
,
1993
, “
Model Updating in Structural Dynamics: A Survey
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
162
(
2
), pp.
347
375
.
2.
Friswell, M. I., and Mottershead. J. E., 1995, Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht.
3.
Ahmadian
,
H.
,
Gladwell
,
G. M. L.
, and
Ismail
,
F.
,
1997
, “
Parameter Selection Strategies in Finite Element Model Updating
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
,
119
(
1
), pp.
37
45
.
4.
Ahmadian, H., 1994, “Finite Element Model Updating Using Modal Testing Data,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Waterloo, Canada.
5.
Gladwell
,
G. M. L.
, and
Ahmadian
,
H.
,
1995
, “
Generic Element Matrices Suitable for Finite Element Model Updating
.”
Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
,
9
(
6
), pp.
601
614
.
6.
Ahmadian, H., Mottershead, J. E., and Friswell, M. I., 1996, “Joint Models for Finite Element Model Updating,” 14th International Modal Analysis Conference, Dearborn, February, pp. 591–596.
7.
Stavrinidis
,
C.
,
Clinckemaillie
,
J.
, and
Dubois
,
J.
,
1989
, “
New Concept for the Finite Element Mass Matrix Formulations
.”
AIAA J.
,
27
(
9
), pp.
1249
1255
.
8.
Qian
,
G.-L.
,
Gu
,
S.-N.
, and
Jiang
,
J.-S.
,
1990
, “
The Dynamic Behavior and Crack Detection of a Beam With a Crack
.”
J. Sound Vib.
,
138
(
2
), pp.
233
243
.
9.
Ahmadian
,
H.
,
Friswell
,
M. I.
, and
Mottershead
,
J. E.
,
1998
, “
Minimization of the Discretization Error in Mass and Stiffness Formulation by an Inverse Method
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
,
41
, pp.
371
387
.
10.
Christides
,
S.
, and
Barr
,
A. D. S.
,
1984
, “
One Dimensional Theory of Cracked Bernoulli-Euler Beams
.”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
,
26
(
11/12
), pp.
639
648
.
11.
Shen
,
M.-H. H.
, and
Pierre
,
C.
,
1990
, “
Natural Modes of Bernoulli-Euler Beams with Symmetric Cracks
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
138
(
1
), pp.
115
134
.
You do not currently have access to this content.