For a growing number of applications, the well-known passive viscoelastic constrained layer damping treatments need to be augmented by some active control technique. However, active controllers generally require time-domain modeling and are very sensitive to system changes while viscoelastic materials properties are highly frequency dependent. Hence, effective methods for time-domain modeling of viscoelastic damping are needed. This can be achieved through internal variables methods, such as the anelastic displacements fields and the Golla-Hughes-McTavish. Unfortunately, they increase considerably the order of the model as they add dissipative degrees of freedom to the system. Therefore, the dimension of the resulting augmented model must be reduced. Several researchers have presented successful methods to reduce the state space coupled system, resulting from a finite element structural model combined with an internal variables viscoelastic model. The present work presents an alternative two-step reduction method for such problems. The first reduction is applied to the second-order model, through a projection of the dissipative modes onto the structural modes. It is then followed by a second reduction applied to the resulting coupled state space model. The reduced-order models are compared in terms of performance and computational efficiency for a cantilever beam with a passive constrained layer damping treatment. Results show a reduction of up to 67% of added dissipative degrees of freedom at the first reduction step leading to much faster computations at the second reduction step.

1.
Garg
,
D. P.
, and
Anderson
,
G. L.
, 2003, “
Structural Damping and Vibration Control Via Smart Sensors and Actuators
,”
J. Vib. Control
1077-5463,
9
, pp.
1421
1452
.
2.
Trindade
,
M. A.
, and
Benjeddou
,
A.
, 2002, “
Hybrid Active-Passive Damping Treatments Using Viscoelastic and Piezoelectric Materials: Review and Assessment
,”
J. Vib. Control
1077-5463,
8
(
6
), pp.
699
746
.
3.
Lesieutre
,
G. A.
, and
Bianchini
,
E.
, 1995, “
Time Domain Modeling of Linear Viscoelasticity Using Anelastic Displacement Fields
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
0739-3717,
117
(
4
), pp.
424
430
.
4.
Golla
,
D. F.
, and
Hughes
,
P. C.
, 1985, “
Dynamics of Viscoelastic Structures—A Time-Domain, Finite Element Formulation
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
52
(
4
), pp.
897
906
.
5.
McTavish
,
D. J.
, and
Hughes
,
P. C.
, 1993, “
Modeling of Linear Viscoelastic Space Structures
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
0739-3717,
115
, pp.
103
110
.
6.
Trindade
,
M. A.
,
Benjeddou
,
A.
, and
Ohayon
,
R.
, 2000, “
Modeling of Frequency-Dependent Viscoelastic Materials for Active-Passive Vibration Damping
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
0739-3717,
122
(
2
), pp.
169
174
.
7.
Friswell
,
M. I.
, and
Inman
,
D. J.
, 1999, “
Reduced-Order Models of Structures With Viscoelastic Components
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
37
(
10
), pp.
1318
1325
.
8.
Park
,
C. H.
,
Inman
,
D. J.
, and
Lam
,
M. J.
, 1999, “
Model Reduction of Viscoelastic Finite Element Models
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
219
(
4
), pp.
619
637
.
9.
Trindade
,
M. A.
,
Benjeddou
,
A.
, and
Ohayon
,
R.
, 2001, “
Piezoelectric Active Vibration Control of Sandwich Damped Beams
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
246
(
4
), pp.
653
677
.
10.
Friot
,
E.
, and
Bouc
,
R.
, 1996, “
Contrôle Optimal par Rétroaction du Rayonnement d’une Plaque Munie de Capteurs et d’Actionneurs Piézo-Électriques Non Colocalisés
,”
2eme Colloque GDR Vibroacoustique
, LMA, Marseille pp.
229
248
.
11.
Trindade
,
M. A.
,
Benjeddou
,
A.
, and
Ohayon
,
R.
, 2001, “
Finite Element Modeling of Hybrid Active-Passive Vibration Damping of Multilayer Piezoelectric Sandwich Beams. Part 1: Formulation and Part 2: System Analysis
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
0029-5981,
51
(
7
), pp.
835
864
.
You do not currently have access to this content.