[S0739-3717(00)00704-2]
Dr. Shahruz claims that Theorem 2 in 1 is stronger than Theorem 1 in 2. Since Dr. Shahruz proves his claim by showing an example, not a mathematical derivation, I feel his argument is not convincing. Also it indicates clearly in 2, that the main purpose of the Theorem in 2 is to use damping to eliminate the parametric resonance. So there is no need for considering a time-varying damping.
1.
Gil, M. L., Stability of Finite and Infinite Systems, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1998.
2.
Wu
, J. W.
, and Fung
, R. F.
, 1999
, ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
, 121
, pp. 509
–511
.Copyright © 2000
by ASME